Yes! She was like a twin with Franziska Schanzkowska...The Franziska Schanzkowska of the photographies, of course. We don't know any FS original photos. All of them are retouched in order to make them exactly equal to AA. Even the more idiotic of the photo experts would realize the retouching areas in all the three photos. One of them(the one where Franziska is wearing a braid over her head, crossing it) was suppossed to be the less retouched of the set, but , in fact, I was told by an expert photograph, D'Azzierno, that this one seems to be more and identy-kit than a real photo...and in the others, the white zinc over the whole face is so evident that anyone would deny that these pics are HEAVILY retouched. The more evident retouching is done in the mouth area, in the hair (to imitate the hairdoss that AA was wearing at the time)and between the eye-brows.
There are not but these three "pics" of FS...
Of course, we must accept that AA was FS, for mtDNA said it...And since in this Forum we can not doubt about it, the matter is settled.
However, I think it's my duty to remember that these three pics were retouched...What for? She was FS...No doubt about it. So, what was the use to retouch those pics? And Doris Wingender recognized AA as FS seeing a bad, whitish photo in the newspaper, with black spotch inestead of eyes and mouth. In this photo you could recognize FS...or anyone else. When the judge asked Mrs. Wingender how could she have recognized her "friend" watching this pic, she became pale started to said that she was sick and have the flu, and went away. Anyone saw her as a witness in AA's case.
People who is saying the truth don't need to use made up facts to prove what they are saying. If Doris Wingender knew that AA was FS...what was the use of lying? And why about the retouched photos?
Well. But we must accept that AA was FS.
RealAnastasia.