Since the person who signed their name as JK spoke of theroy I had going on in my mind, and that I inherited the ancestral markings of who I believed some royals inherited the same, (JK does know I so inhereited the ancsetral gentic markings).
As to his understanding of royals who did inhereit the same, that person did not bother looking at the book of photos presented a few years back when I opened the book to JK and friend to look at the royals who did inherit the markings spoken of. So if facts turn in to theroy and its all in my head then go with the theroy belief.
You also spoke of if my theroy had some validity? and did I realize what I may face as to having the book thrown at me. If that is one way of facts been known then let them throw as hard as they can.
As to your question if my theroy had some validity I will reply with this comment, Czar Nicholas 11 and his son mentioned in my previous comments both inherited the same markings, and if that so called theroy is only theroy then why do a few photos of father and son show what I speak of in photos on file in Tsarevich Alexei Nicholaievich section.
It is easy to critize when one wants to put a persons facts aside as theroy when they are not knowledgeable of the facts. As to why I pursue my wish to have the markings discoverd it is like the gentlman who had a dream of palaces of the Czars, he wanted the truth to be known.
William
Noble_Decendents.bloodline@yahoo.ca
[Hello William,
Lets say your theory has some validity
do you know what is coming at you,
they will ask you to cross reference your findings with hundreds of people (and still not be satisfied)
who have the same and or similar markings,
before they would consider your findings.
Most likely they would still through the book at you
after all your work!
You have taken on more than a handful with your endeavor
Viel Glueck!
[/quote]
