Author Topic: Not allowed to be Tsar?  (Read 29552 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dolgoruky18

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #90 on: September 19, 2007, 05:12:23 PM »
It would indeed ! But... are you really sure you want us all to go any further down this path ? Surely it would be wrong to expose our esteemed Moderators to possible legal action ? I don't think so.

Valmont

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #91 on: September 19, 2007, 07:09:45 PM »
Legal action??? what for?.. I am lost here..Would anyone care to explain.. or at least PM me?
Thanks

Nicolay

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #92 on: September 19, 2007, 07:24:09 PM »
dolgoruky18 is talking about his profs papers (I believe)?????


I am assuming here,

but I think William is talking of the upper right corner of the left ear.
this is the best picture I have found in a few seconds.
http://everleaf.com/chasewinfield/images/nickeagle3.jpg

William is this what you are talking about?

Noble_descendents

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #93 on: September 19, 2007, 07:45:37 PM »
William,

I am curious as to what these markings look like.

Would it be possible for you to post a photo on this forum?

You mention a photo of father and son, Nicholas II and Alexis, where the markings are shown.

Would it be possible for you to post this photo.

Lisa

As in our discussion previously, I mentioned my intent was to provide such ancestral inheritance evidence to the head of the Romanov family line and or the scientist in Russia who will be conducting DNA test on the remains found recently. As I have not been able to make contact with them I will just let my infomation of inheritence sit for now theirs and mine, and see what the test results are.

As to posting the pictures not at this time but as mentioned they can be seen in two or three photos.


William

noble_descendents.bloodline@yahoo.ca





Noble_descendents

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #94 on: September 19, 2007, 07:54:43 PM »
dolgoruky18 is talking about his profs papers (I believe)?????


I am assuming here,

but I think William is talking of the upper right corner of the left ear.
this is the best picture I have found in a few seconds.
http://everleaf.com/chasewinfield/images/nickeagle3.jpg

William is this what you are talking about?


I wish I could say yes but no I do not see any inheritence there.  But but I will say what I speak of is identical on both sides, one can look at a hundred or more photos of a person with them and may never see the inherited markings because of lighting, shade or angle when picture taken. But a nice effort shown by you.

 

Nicolay

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #95 on: September 19, 2007, 09:15:31 PM »
 ;)
this should bring us to the end of this,
let us know if they ever contact you.

Noble_descendents

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #96 on: September 19, 2007, 11:55:25 PM »
I am in full agreement no further facts of inheritance of visible markings will be forthcoming to this site and only released to said mentioned persons. This will protect royals who show the same and the linage this genetic inheritance decended down through.

I further look forward to JK's success in finding what he is investigating as we both have facts but of a different nature.  Mine in visible inheritance of a shared gene, and his proving his subject of another genetic nature.  Thanks JK for your earlier comments establishing such visible markings do exist on me, which proves the ancestral gentic visible marker does decend in family blood lines been mine or theirs, it does not matter as we share the same genetic ancestor which creates the blood line that produces the visible markers.

Good luck with your research on your important issue.

William

noble_descendents.bloodline@yahoo.ca

helenazar

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #97 on: September 20, 2007, 08:19:27 AM »
Yes photographic evidence would assist in this issue.

Well... not really.

dmitri

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #98 on: September 20, 2007, 08:26:46 AM »
This all seems a touch surreal and away with the fairies to me. I wonder what it has to do with Alexis?

helenazar

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #99 on: September 20, 2007, 08:41:35 AM »
This all seems a touch surreal and away with the fairies to me. I wonder what it has to do with Alexis?

Absolutely nothing.

dmitri

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #100 on: September 20, 2007, 10:37:40 PM »
In total agreement Helen_A.

Robert_Hall

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #101 on: September 20, 2007, 10:56:00 PM »
I do not think even the faeries would buy this one.  Belongs with Marie Antoinette's great, great, great....grandaughter on another thread.

dmitri

  • Guest
Alexis
« Reply #102 on: September 22, 2007, 05:03:10 AM »
Yes way overdue in time to get back to the real Tsarevich Alexis. I always find his early death by such violent means a tragedy. He really must have been totally effected by the revolution and imprisonment. To be born into such wealth and then to be reduced to imprisonment must have had a truly traumatic effect on the boy. After all from his earliest memories he was brought up to be the next ruler of a vast empire. He must have been quite shattered.

amanduhh592

  • Guest
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #103 on: September 22, 2007, 06:47:58 PM »
Yes, that is probably true. It must have been very weird.

Offline Alice

  • Graf
  • ***
  • Posts: 289
    • View Profile
Re: Not allowed to be Tsar?
« Reply #104 on: October 02, 2007, 01:38:11 AM »
Oh please, not earlobes again!

I've had it with earlobes, after the AA debates . . .