So, I've now seen this documentary and have some conclusions myself:
The first mistake they did was when Alexander Avdonin, Geli Ryabov and others were speaking. Instead of writing subtitles, my preferred method of translation, the English dubbed voice talked over the Russian one. The problem with this I found, was that in editing the documentary, they did not minimize the sound of the Russian voice, so it sounds like two people fighting to speak at the same time. This became a problem for me, because I couldn't understand what either of them were trying to say. I found this disappointing, being they are primary people involved in the bone excavation, I would have liked to hear what they had to say.
The second, is the misidentification of the daughters.This did bother me, as they had countless historians on hand (Penny, Greg, Peter, John, etc) who knew their stuff, they had no excuse to mess-up the identification.
The final thing that made me cringe,was John Klier's comment near the end of the documentary in which he says that people are interested in the Romanov history because it was "sexy". I know that he made more comments after that, which I do agree with, it's just the word itself made me a little uncomfortable, because I find nothing about the Romanov history sexy.
---------------------
Other then that, it was an interesting documentary.
Just thought I would post my two cents where I can.
