Author Topic: Re: So who WAS she, then?  (Read 112659 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jeremygaleaz

  • Guest
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #615 on: April 17, 2005, 10:29:02 PM »
Quote

IF -IF -IF -IF -  :-[I know -- lets all run counterclockwise rather than clockwise -- then it will start to make sence!


Yes, this  is just like that scene out of  "Alice In Wonderland" where everyone is running around in circles on the beach..... ???

Or, perhaps,  we're all trapped forever at a never ending tea party , hosted by -you know who -as the Mad Hatter, and AGRBear as the March Hare... ;)

But who then to play the Queen ("off with his head!") of Hearts?

Well, a very merry unbirthday to all, but ,perhaps for me, enough is enough. ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by jeremygaleaz »

Offline Helen_Azar

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 7472
  • Coming up Fall 2015: Tatiana's diaries and letters
    • View Profile
    • War-time diaries of Grand Duchess Olga Nikolaevna Romanov
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #616 on: April 18, 2005, 06:46:49 AM »
Quote
IF AA is NOT FS then the following is correct: The mtDNA tests does allow the possibility of AA's, Gertrude's and FS's mothers to be cousins through their mothers' lineage.


Yes this is correct, just as long as you keep in mind that the chance of this being the case (AA not being FS but another random distant maternal relative) is only about 0.000125%, which is practically ZERO.

P.S.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by helenazar »

Offline AGRBear

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 6611
  • The road to truth is the best one to travel.
    • View Profile
    • Romanov's  Russia
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #617 on: April 18, 2005, 02:22:13 PM »
Quote
IF AA is NOT FS then the following is correct:

The mtDNA tests does allow the possibility of AA's, Gertrude's and FS's mothers to be cousins through their mothers' lineage.

AGRBear



Quote

Yes this is correct, just as long as you keep in mind that the chance of this being the case (AA not being FS but another random distant maternal relative) is only about 0.000125%, which is practically ZERO.

P.S.



If it's possible then it can not be "zero".

AGRBear  ;D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by AGRBear »
"What is true by lamplight is not always true by sunlight."

Joubert, Pensees, No. 152

Offline Helen_Azar

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 7472
  • Coming up Fall 2015: Tatiana's diaries and letters
    • View Profile
    • War-time diaries of Grand Duchess Olga Nikolaevna Romanov
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #618 on: April 18, 2005, 02:46:31 PM »
Quote
If it's possible then it can not be "zero".
 



Offline Annie

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4756
    • View Profile
    • Anna Anderson Exposed!
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #619 on: April 19, 2005, 10:47:07 AM »


and a few more that bear brings to mind


 


Mgmstl

  • Guest
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #620 on: April 19, 2005, 11:33:03 AM »
Yes Jeremy and I have always wondered how many sandwiches your picnic basket is short of also.. more than once.   >:(

Personally I think the DNA fanatics are on some kind of jihad...

jeremygaleaz

  • Guest
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #621 on: April 19, 2005, 12:01:48 PM »
Quote
Yes Jeremy and I have always wondered how many sandwiches your picnic basket is short of also.. more than once.   >:(

Personally I think the DNA fanatics are on some kind of jihad...


Welcome back to the Wonderland tea party/ beach run Michael G. Do you take sugar with your beverage? ;) ::)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by jeremygaleaz »

Offline AGRBear

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 6611
  • The road to truth is the best one to travel.
    • View Profile
    • Romanov's  Russia
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #622 on: April 19, 2005, 12:04:00 PM »
Michale, hadn't you noticed, they are little heads banging against the wall of truth which we constantly remind them is still standing.

Heads of people who don't want to stay on topic>> <<Wall of truth


;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

So back on topic:

So, who Was she, then?

If AA wasn't  FS and FS wasn't AA _________  ______.

You're supose to fill in the blanks about who you think AA could have been.

Come on, try it.  I promise it won't hurt to speculate.

AGRBear
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by AGRBear »
"What is true by lamplight is not always true by sunlight."

Joubert, Pensees, No. 152

Offline Annie

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4756
    • View Profile
    • Anna Anderson Exposed!
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #623 on: April 19, 2005, 12:23:39 PM »
bear, as I posted a few days ago, this has been dragging on for MONTHS and there are NO other leads, just as there is no real killer in the OJ case! No one has come up with even one viable candidate, even a name, just wild guesses of a  'Cheka plant' or an indentical cousin! Could it be the reason there is no one else is because we have our woman, and her name was FS? And again, don't say anyone was 'closed minded' or 'in a box' or didn't give this a chance, look at the size of this thread!!! Barring some earthshaking revelation (which ISN'T coming because it doesn't exist) this case is closed! We gave it a shot, but it's over!

Offline AGRBear

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 6611
  • The road to truth is the best one to travel.
    • View Profile
    • Romanov's  Russia
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #624 on: April 19, 2005, 01:43:32 PM »
You are probably right Annie.  25 pages is long enough.

There can be absolutely  no reason to continue to look around for possible answers.  Why would we want to know who AA was if she wasn't FS?

Silly old Bear.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by AGRBear »
"What is true by lamplight is not always true by sunlight."

Joubert, Pensees, No. 152

Mgmstl

  • Guest
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #625 on: April 19, 2005, 01:47:35 PM »
Sorry Jeremy I only accept drinks from friends... ;D ;)

jeremygaleaz

  • Guest
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #626 on: April 19, 2005, 01:51:36 PM »
Quote
Sorry Jeremy I only accept drinks from friends... ;D ;)


I'm heartbroken at your refusal!  ::)

Things are not going well very well for you today, are they Michael?

Perhaps you would like to take any personal problems with me over to PM ? Thank you!  ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by jeremygaleaz »

Mgmstl

  • Guest
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #627 on: April 19, 2005, 02:30:50 PM »
No Jeremy, things are fine today, why do you ask? ::)

I just come back to find the DNA jihadists referring to people that don't believe as the do, as crazy, a little off the beam, etc...So I just fire back a few rounds to keep things in order, that's all.   ;D ;D

Offline Michelle

  • Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 998
  • No more school forever!  Well,except college.
    • View Profile
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #628 on: May 08, 2005, 09:26:16 PM »
Yes, Micheal, I'm sick of the insults too.  >:(

Offline Annie

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4756
    • View Profile
    • Anna Anderson Exposed!
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #629 on: May 08, 2005, 10:03:28 PM »
I've been sick of them for a very long time :(

(note the term 'jihadist' in his last post- is that not an insult?) :P