Author Topic: Would Emelian Pugachev had been a good emperer?  (Read 4356 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The_Ferret

  • Guest
Would Emelian Pugachev had been a good emperer?
« on: November 15, 2004, 02:53:57 AM »
I say he could not have been worse than the Romonovs. At least the serfs would have been liberated a lot sooner.

Offline HerrKaiser

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 1373
    • View Profile
Re: Would Emelian Pugachev had been a good emperer
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2004, 03:07:19 PM »
Hmmmm. I doubt he'd have been much better. His form of dictatorship/anarchy may have freed serfs sooner, but freed into what? More slavery likely. His actions actually made life worse. Well intended brutes usually end up dead or no better than what they hoped to fix.
HerrKaiser